ChurnIQ
Telco Churn Modelling

Explainability Insights

Review the biggest churn drivers using SHAP and LIME with the active data source and model context in view.

Built-in modelPre-trained XGBoost model
Insight Context

Interpret the model with commercial context in view

This page ties model explainability to the currently selected dataset and confirmed model so teams can move from raw feature impact to clear retention action.

Default datasetModel confirmed
Dataset
IBM Telco churn dataset
Current source for insight interpretation
Model
Pre-trained XGBoost model
Explainer anchored to the active model choice
Strongest churn driver
Month-to-month contract
+0.380 SHAP
Best retention signal
Tenure
-0.290 SHAP
Executive Readout

What matters most right now

Month-to-month contract

Customer contract term

+0.380
Tenure

Months the customer has stayed with the provider

-0.290
Monthly charges

Recurring monthly bill amount

+0.220

SHAP Feature Importance

Positive values push predictions toward churn. Negative values pull them toward retention.

SHAP
Strongest churn driver
Month-to-month contract
+0.380 SHAP
Best retention signal
Tenure
-0.290 SHAP
Signals reviewed
10
Feature effects in the current model summary

How to read SHAP

Positive SHAP means a feature is increasing churn risk.

Negative SHAP means a feature is helping retention.

The larger the absolute value, the stronger the influence on the model decision.

Recommended reading approach

Start with the strongest positive signals to understand where churn pressure is building, then compare them with the strongest negative signals to see which customer protections are already working.

Top Churn Risks

Month-to-month contract+0.380
Monthly charges+0.220
Fiber internet service+0.180
No tech support+0.140
No online security+0.110
© 2026 Warieta Gift Ejovwoke.

Personal project focused on churn prediction, retention strategy, and explainable analytics.